Fiscal multiplier bench calculator.
Build a hypothetical fiscal package by composition, then estimate the one-year and three-year GDP impact, jobs implied, and net cost after tax revenue offset. Multipliers are state-dependent: they rise when the output gap is negative, when monetary policy is accommodative, and when the economy is closed. All math runs in your browser.
Outputs
Formulas
- weighted_mult = sum(share_i * baseline_mult_i) for i in {invest, cons, tax_hi, tax_lo, transfers, defense}
- slack_adj = 1 + 0.4 * max(0, -output_gap) (each 1pp of negative gap adds 0.4 to multiplier scale)
- mp_adj = {accommodative: 1.3, neutral: 1.0, restrictive: 0.7}
- open_adj = 0.92 ^ (max(0, openness - 10) / 10)
- composite_mult = weighted_mult * slack_adj * mp_adj * open_adj
- year1_gdp = package_size * composite_mult
- year3_gdp = year1_gdp * (1 + 0.6 + 0.6^2)
- jobs = (year1_gdp / 1B) * 11,000
- tax_offset = year3_gdp * 0.30
- net_cost = package_size - tax_offset
Methodology
Baseline multipliers come from the Auerbach-Gorodnichenko (2012) regime-switching VAR, the CBO (2015) compositional table, the Ramey (2019) Handbook of Macroeconomics survey, and the Zidar (2019) tax decomposition. The state-dependent adjustments combine three documented findings: multipliers are larger when the output gap is negative (Auerbach-Gorodnichenko 2012; Jorda-Taylor 2016), larger when monetary policy is accommodative or at the zero lower bound (Christiano-Eichenbaum-Rebelo 2011; Eggertsson-Krugman 2012), and smaller in open economies because some demand leaks abroad through imports (Ilzetzki-Mendoza-Vegh 2013).
The multipliers used here are aggregate point estimates with wide confidence intervals. Empirical 95 percent bounds typically span 0.5 on the high-MPC categories (tax cuts to low-income, transfers, investment) and 0.4 on the low-MPC categories (tax cuts to high-income, government consumption). For an actual scoring exercise, run the package through a structural model (Federal Reserve FRB/US, IMF GIMF, or CBO macroeconomic policy module) and present a fan chart, not a point estimate.
The 11,000 jobs per billion of GDP heuristic is from the CBO 2010 ARRA scoring; it is appropriate for short-horizon impact in the US, with downside skew when slack is small. The 30 percent revenue offset reflects the federal-plus-state effective rate on induced personal and corporate income; in deep recessions automatic stabilizers raise the offset to 40 percent.
For the full Fiscal Multiplier Bench framework with state-dependent VAR estimation, scenario tables, and category- level uncertainty bands, see the methodology one-pager. Adjacent reading: fiscal insights and the policy impact modeling practice.
Sources for default values and benchmarks: Auerbach and Gorodnichenko, "Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy," AEJ Economic Policy 2012; Ramey, "Macroeconomic Shocks and Their Propagation," Handbook of Macroeconomics 2019; Zidar, "Tax Cuts for Whom?" JPE 2019; Mertens and Olea, QJE 2018; Christiano, Eichenbaum, Rebelo, JPE 2011; Ilzetzki, Mendoza, Vegh, JME 2013; Nakamura and Steinsson, AER 2014; CBO, "Estimated Impact of the ARRA on Employment and Economic Output," 2010 to 2015 series; BEA NIPA 2024.